Bryn Kenney GGPoker Lawsuit: 5% Stake, $3M a Year at Issue

Bryn Kenney is suing NSUS Group, the owner of GGPoker, in a case now before a federal court in Nevada over a 5% stake in the business he says he was promised in 2018 and commissions he says were cut by more than $3 million a year.

Bryn Kenney GGPoker lawsuit: the 5% NSUS stake and $3 million a year in commissions at issue in Kenney v. Kim

The complaint names NSUS Group, NSUS Limited, chief executive Michael Kim (Mansoo Kim in some reports) and a fourth defendant, and alleges breach of contract and fraud. It was filed in Nevada state court in July 2026 and moved to federal court on 25 August.

Kenney, the all-time live tournament money leader with more than $90 million in tracked live cashes, signed with GGPoker in March 2018 and left its ambassador programme in 2020. He is asking for damages and an accounting, which would put the commission records in front of the court.

Kim filed a motion to dismiss on 23 September, and a federal judge in Nevada hears it on 12 November 2026. No statement from GGPoker or NSUS had been published by 14 October. NEXT.io, which first reported the complaint that day, said it had asked both sides for comment.

Item Detail
Case Kenney v. Kim et al, 2:26-cv-02704
Court US District Court, District of Nevada
Origin Nevada state court, July 2026
Moved to federal court 25 August 2026
Defendants Michael Kim, NSUS Group Inc, NSUS Limited and one other
Claims Breach of contract and fraud, per the complaint as reported
Relief sought Damages and an accounting
Next filing 26 October 2026, Kim’s reply on the motion to dismiss
Hearing 12 November 2026, on the motion to dismiss

The docket is the public record for the case. The detail of what Kenney alleges comes from the complaint as reported, and every figure that rests on it is labelled as his claim. VIP-Grinders is a GGPoker affiliate partner.

The 5% Stake Kenney Says He Was Promised in 2018

According to the complaint, Kenney signed an endorsement agreement with NSUS Limited in March 2018. That August, it says, Kim proposed widening the relationship to a 5% equity stake in the business plus commissions on the players Kenney brought in.

He was one of GGPoker’s first high-profile signings, two years before Fedor Holz joined the roster he left in March 2026. The stake, the complaint says, was never recognised in any form.

Date Event Source
March 2018 Endorsement agreement with NSUS Limited Complaint
August 2018 Kim allegedly proposes a 5% stake plus commissions Complaint
2019 $5 million in commission revenue, per Kenney Complaint
2020 Kenney leaves the ambassador programme Complaint
1 August 2024 NSUS agrees to buy the WSOP brand for $500 million Caesars release
29 October 2024 WSOP purchase completed Caesars release

The filing then points at the biggest number in the room. NSUS agreed to buy the World Series of Poker brand from Caesars for $500 million on 1 August 2024 and completed the purchase on 29 October, and Kenney alleges his interest was never accounted for when it did.

A slice of the buyer does not pay out when the buyer buys something. What the WSOP deal does is set a public price beside a private business, and it is the only public figure anyone can put near the stake Kenney claims.

What the stake would be worth: nothing public says. NSUS is privately held, has never published a valuation, and the $500 million measures what it paid for the WSOP, not what NSUS itself is worth. The complaint, as reported, puts no dollar figure on the 5%.

How the Commissions Were Allegedly Cut From $5M a Year

Kenney says he received $5 million in commission revenue in 2019. After that, the complaint alleges, four things happened to the players he had recruited and the money they generated.

  • Players were removed from his network on GGPoker’s internal systems, so their rake no longer counted towards him.
  • Deductions he had not agreed to were taken from his commissions.
  • His commission rate was reduced unilaterally.
  • Agents who had recruited players through him were approached to move their accounts under company control.

Bryn Kenney at the WSOP 2026 $250,000 Super High Roller final table, where he finished runner-up for $2,776,634

The result, he claims, was annual commission income more than $3 million below what it had been. Alongside damages, for which no figure has been reported, he asks for an accounting, which means the court ordering the books opened so the figures can be checked.

In an April 2022 interview with PokerNews, Kenney said his ambassador role had grown into something closer to an affiliate deal, and that he “influenced and advised them on the tournaments, guarantees, satellite schedules”.

The Cheating Claim in the Complaint

The complaint’s final strand is that Kim assured Kenney robust anti-cheating measures were in place, that Kenney later learned systematic cheating was occurring, and that Kim eventually blamed him for it. Kim is asking the court to dismiss the case.

Where this claim stands: it sits in a civil complaint and is contested. No court has ruled on it, the motion to dismiss argues the case should not proceed, and neither GGPoker nor NSUS has answered the cheating claim in public.

It is separate from the April 2022 allegations against Kenney, when former stable member Martin Zamani accused him on social media of ghosting, collusion and real-time assistance in his staking group. Kenney denied most of it; no sanction followed.

GGPoker’s public handling of cheating since then includes the MoneyTaker69 case of December 2023, where players flagged an account exploiting a data leak. The room banned it and confiscated $29,795.

Kenney has said he has never been banned from GGPoker, and he won a WSOP Online bracelet there in 2024.

What Happens Next in the Bryn Kenney GGPoker Lawsuit

The 12 November hearing is on Kim’s motion to dismiss, not the merits. A judge can dismiss the case, strike parts and let Kenney amend, or deny the motion and send it into discovery, where the accounting would begin.

Before that, Kenney’s response to the motion was due on 14 October and Kim’s reply is due on 26 October, under a court order issued on 9 October.

Still missing What would close it
A GGPoker or NSUS statement The company’s own account, or an answer filed in court
The grounds for dismissal The motion itself, which no report has described
The ruling on the motion The 12 November hearing, or a written order after it
The dollar value of the claim The complaint’s prayer for relief, which no report has carried
Kenney’s public comment Anything from his own accounts since the filing
The state filing date The state court docket entry, which the federal docket does not reproduce

The motion and the hearing date rest on NEXT.io’s reading of the court file, and the briefing dates on the federal docket, until the next filings appear.

Kenney has not stood still since 2020. He co-founded 4Poker in 2022, a real-money site built for Latin America, and in July 2026 became the first player past $90 million in tracked live cashes.

The ruling will decide whether this is a dispute that ends on paper or one that opens GGPoker’s commission records to a court. Whatever lands first will be in the follow-ups in the poker news section.

FAQs

Why is Bryn Kenney suing GGPoker?

Kenney is suing NSUS Group, NSUS Limited, chief executive Michael Kim and one other defendant for breach of contract and fraud. He says he was promised a 5% stake in the business in August 2018 that was never recognised, and that his commissions on recruited players were cut by more than $3 million a year. None of the claims has been tested in court.

What is the 5% stake in the Bryn Kenney GGPoker lawsuit?

It is an equity interest Kenney says Michael Kim offered him in August 2018 alongside commissions, on top of the March 2018 endorsement deal. The complaint says it was never recognised, including when NSUS bought the WSOP brand for $500 million in 2024. No public valuation of NSUS exists, so nobody outside the case can price it.

When is the Bryn Kenney GGPoker lawsuit hearing?

The hearing is on 12 November 2026 in federal court in Nevada, on the motion to dismiss filed by Michael Kim on 23 September. The case was filed in Nevada state court in July 2026 and moved to federal court on 25 August 2026 as case 2:26-cv-02704.

Is the lawsuit connected to the 2022 cheating allegations against Kenney?

No. The 2022 allegations came from Martin Zamani on social media and concerned Kenney’s staking group; Kenney denied most of them and no sanction followed. The lawsuit’s cheating claim runs the other way: Kenney alleges he was assured GGPoker had robust anti-cheating measures and later learned systematic cheating was occurring.

Der Beitrag Bryn Kenney GGPoker Lawsuit: 5% Stake, $3M a Year at Issue erschien zuerst auf VIP-Grinders.

Full Article

About The Author